What is the role and importance of Friar Lawrence which lead to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet Essay Example

What is the role and importance of Friar Lawrence which lead to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet Essay Romeo and Juliet are emblems of true love that have been used over the years as icons for other lovers who found themselves torn in half like them, many of whom faced a similar ill-fated end. The ingredients of a tragedy are all sewn into this play, which is unusual for Shakespeare as most of his work in the early years was comedies and historical plays. The heroes in this story portray excess courage, arrogance and ambition.They took life changing decisions despite their tender age. The affects of the play on the audience is cleansing as they feel pity and terror. In my opinion the reason for the lovers downfall lies outside the actions of any characters and ultimately in the workings of fate which is referred to several times throughout the play. Romeo and Juliet is considered a tragedy by many as it fits in with the requirements set out by Aristotle. Shakespeare used a variet of sources for this drama. The story of Romeo and Julliet is taken from the poem a Tragical history of Ro meus and Juliet.We are going to study at first hand the role played by Friar Lawrence which contributed to the lovers death. We will begin by looking at what his ideal role in the communtiy would have been. We will also look at his character, and the motives behind the actions he took. However before we analyse the Friar we must study the social backround of the play.Italy at that time was regarded as a passionate and wealthy place; hence an ideal setting for this tragedy. Love is as you would expect the plays central and most significant theme. Shakespeare helps to depict love in many different forms; it is aggressive, euphoric, intense, and without doubt overcomes all other ethics and morals. Shakespeare uses religion to illustrate the lovers passion, This holy shrine. whereas at other times love is described as a sort of magic: Alike bewitched by the charm of looks. Juliet perhaps most perfectly describes her love for Romeo by refusing to describe it: I cannot sum up sum of half my wealth. Love, in other words resists any single metaphor as it is too powerful to be contained with words. Their love and infatuation with each other caused the young lovers to challenge their family name, Deny thy father and refuse thy name, and Juliet asks, Or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, and Ill no longer be a Capulet.The social institutions at that time regarded marriage as way of gaining status and economic stability. Early on Shakespeare introduced a society that prefigures capitalism, one that is heavily influenced by material exchange. The people of Verona relied on pride, honour and money, even when the item in question was love. When speaking of marriage the Capulets use language full of economic expressions. Capulets instructions to Paris are that; Inherit at my house. Hear all, all see, and like her most whose merit most shall be; which one more view, of many, mine being one. Lady Capulet also refers to the relationship between Paris and her daughter as a n egotiation when she explains to Juliet how she may, By having him she would be making herself no less.This economically driven society alienated spiritual concerns leading to a gloomy peace prevailing. Love in that era was a commodity such as goods and services. Parents fully expected to make money on their trade.Honour was also a central issue for the people of Verona, a person would have to side with their family even if they were in the wrong or face being seen as a traitor. Romeo and Juliet went against their family honour by marrying an enemy. But the social emphasis placed on masculine honour was so profound that Romeo could not merely ignore the dispute just because he loves Juliet. It dictated his irrational behaviour that took another life and separated the families further. Both were in a constant dilemma between the responsibilities and actions demanded by the social institutions, and those demanded by their private desires. Romeos sense of honour leads him to find the pr iest so he can marry them.In the sixteenth century the priest was seen as a person who was willing to dedicate his whole life to religion, a man of God and a bound between local communities. They played a fundamental role in their communities especially in times of conflict, where their judgement and judicious advice was principal. Laurence is presented as a holy man who was trusted and respected by all the other characters. Capulets comment about the Friar that all our whole city is much bound to him is an ironic acknowledgment as he played an important role in the many disastrous events which followed and abused his trusted role. Thus the Friar is centrally placed with close ties to everyone enabling him to carry out his plans without questioning. His knowledge of Greek mythology and his great understanding of plants show Friar Lawrences high level of education as he speaks of the Greek God Titan.The first speech for the Friar is very important; it is both rhythmic and calm. It en ables the audience to create their first impressions and establishes a standard for the Friar which he tries to maintain, but sadly fails. The regularity of the speech calms someone in to a feeling of acceptance as he is expressing the conventional attitudes of a priest, not his own, and one feels a sense of falseness. Shakespeare uses the Friars language to manipulate the audiences feelings towards him. The words are all used for effect and we question the real wisdom and knowledge of the Friar.Friar Lawrence has a vast knowledge of plants and flowers, and grows a magnificent garden, he is first introduced as an apothecary rather then a Friar, which is the historical name for a medical practitioner who formulates and dispenses medication. He remarks that every plant and herb has its own special properties, and that nothing exists in nature that cannot be put to both good and bad use.Thus, poison is not intrinsically evil but is instead a natural material made lethal by human hands. Here poison symbolizes human societys predisposition to poison good things and make them lethal, In man as well as herbs grace and rude will, just as the futile Capulet-Montague dispute turns Romeo and Juliets love to poison. Ironically the Friars own words and thoughts are depicted over the course of the play as the events unfold. Unlike many of the other tragedies, this play does not have an evil villain, but rather people whose good qualities are turned to poison by the world in which they live in.The Friar chooses to concern himself with the health of the body and mind, so he chooses to use only those herbs which are not harmful he says that naught so vile on the earth doth live, but to the earth some special good doth give. The apothecary on the other hand, does not worry about Romeos spiritual or physical health, and so he chooses to use his herbs for the sale of all substances, including poisons. Shakespeare contrasts the Friars hopefulness with the harsher material world of Verona, placing him and the apothecary on two opposite sides, thus where the Friar fails, the apothecary steps in with a quick remedy. While the Friar has botanical supplies to aid in his medical work, including a basket of willows, baleful weeds, and precious-juiced flowers, the apothecarys shop contains objects only for show or for superficial use. Even attitudes towards the shops are different.Romeo remarks on the apothecarys shop with obvious neglect, as it is full of dusty boxes and very few actual items are set up to try to attract customers. Shakespeares presentation of the Friars cell and garden characterizes a philosopher and healer, and the apothecarys shop an unsuccessful salesman. Thus the audience is forced to compare the two figures and note their remarkable differences. The play uses the priests fading holistic medicine to show how economic materialism has made the apothecary a less charitable medical practitioner. The Friars experience of plants enabled him to carry out his second role as poison commissioner, without him Juliet would not have been able to fake her own death.The Friar is a close friend and advisor to Romeo and has a huge influence on his decisions, this is apparent when Romeo addresses the Friar as father and the Friar addresses Romeo as his son. The Friar makes all the important decisions with regards to Romeo and Juliet, and what ever he advises them they follow to the book. Romeo on numerous occasions seeks help and consolation from the Friar. When Romeo comes to tell Friar Lawrence about his engagement, the Friar offers wise pieces of advice, young mens love lies in their eyes meaning Romeo should love Juliet for who she is and not how she looks.He also tells Romeo that women may fall when there is no strength in men, meaning that if he is not stable and constant Juliet may become inconstant herself, and thinks that Romeo may be blinded by love. this allows the reader to depict and build up an image of a friar who is unders tanding, rational and a man who understands the need of moderation especially in the case of Romeo and Juliet not the stereotyped friars we see now a days in society, his holy understanding of religion also is reinforced when the nurse was astounded by the friars speech and stayed the night to hear good counsel. This portrays to the reader the manner he spoke provided motivating guidance.Children at that time were subservient to the adults in the family; they were raised to respect and obey their parents. The fact that Romeo and Juliet were unable to inform their parents of their love illustrates the huge gap between them and their families. This in fact gives the Friar an extra duty of care, as he becomes solely responsible for their actions as he is there lone confident. In Juliets case the role of the mother is taken over by the wet nurse who Juliet often finds solace with, they are affectionate towards each other, and often the nurse refers to Juliet as lamb and pretty fool. Thu s he plays another important role as confident and adviser to both the young lovers. This also reflects the technique used by Shakespeare by the balancing of the characters.Friar Lawrences attributes seem to have become contaminated as we go through the play and he makes a number of fatal mistakes. Firstly he marries the two lovers without their parents consent, and on Romeos return from killing Tybalt, the Friar encourages Romeo to stand strong and to consummate the marriage Ascend her chamber, hence and comfort her, knowing full well that the differences between the two families are now irreconcilable. Many critics may have seen this event as a chance for the Friar to re-think his next steps and annul their marriage.Other flaws in the Friars character became apparent as his involvement in the schemes of Romeo and Juliet increased; and he began to warp cunning and calculating plans out of his head, such as the fanatical potion plan. Some readers may think that the Friar felt to bla me and wanted to try and rectify matters, and do the right thing since his reputation was paramount to him.His deceptiveness surfaces first surfaces of which was between Juliet and Paris, and the other was when Juliets body was discovered. Being fully aware of the truth the Friar had the impertinence to use religion she is advanced above the clouds, as high as heaven itself and laid guilt on the family you love your child so ill and the heavens do lower upon you for some ill to calm and control the situation and to continue on with his plan. The Friar also remains very composed throughout this scene which reinforces his superiority and confidence among the community.Building up the wild potion plan in his head, the Friar must have felt hesitant, apprehensive, and very worried. This is evident as he thinks the plan is as desperate an execution, as the one they were trying to prevent, and ironically Juliet would need to copst with death himself to scape from it. The Friar should have listened to his own wise words before giving the potion to Juliet. He should not have played the role of God. As a man of God should he not have subdued to the will of God and not tried to take fate into his own hands? People of God usually made logical thoroughly thought out decisions, this Friar is very distant from these expectations and many may have labelled him as being too politically ambitious and a fate meddler. The Friar himself acknowledges the power of God at the end of the play, A greater power than we can contradict hath thwarted our intents, so what possessed him to take such actions?Another deplorable aspect of the Friars behaviour is his response when he finds Juliet in the tomb, instead of remaining with her and preventing her death; he flees at the sound of people coming. This shows his fear of accepting responsibility and his selfishness. This use of nature for unnatural purposes is also ironic as he ultimately, acts distinctly human by fleeing the tomb and aban doning Juliet.In addition to this on numerous occasions the Friar seems to be aware that this marriage would only lead to chaos and catastrophe. When addressing Romeo about his previous love (Rosaline), he states that both women where not the right lovers for Romeo Not in a grave, To lay one in, another out it have, suggesting that his second choice of lover is just as bad as the first. Also when marrying Romeo and Juliet he asks smile the heavens in order that sorrow chide us not. This feeling of uneasiness is further reinforced when claiming that violent delights have violent ends using an extreme metaphor to describe Romeos passion like fire and powder hence a very explosive obsession.Many would argue that if the Friar had such a bad feeling about the whole thing, why he did he go ahead with it? Perhaps the Lawrence felt an internal conflict within him the conflict of self against self.- He knew in his mind that it was wrong to help Romeo and Juliet run away with her lover, who happened to be a murderer too. But he felt himself reach out to them, he had known them seen they were children and knew they were in a desperate situation. But the problem was that the only way to solve everything was to take a wrong path that everyone opposed to.The Friar does have some positive aspects to his personality. His initial decision to marry the lovers is well-meaning as he believes it may turn the hatred between the families to pure love he agrees to marry Romeo and Juliet in the hope that their marriage will heal the rift between the Montagues and the Capulets. However he was naive in his assessment of the feud and hadnt reflected fully on the implications of Romeo and Juliets clandestine marriage.Some might argue that the Friar married them hastily because he wanted to direct their relationship towards a positive end, and prevent them having pre-marital sex. Marriage is sacred to the church and once Romeo and Juliet were married and their marriage was consummated, it became part of the Friars duty to protect this marriage; in addition it would be sinful for Juliet to re-marry whilst still being married to Romeo. In a society filled with materialism the Friar may be seen as a humble servant to divine love. At the end of the play Friar Laurence owns up and accepts the death sentence because of his role in the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Of course he wasnt to know that the marriage would have had such a tragic ending.However, he feels guilty and is prepared to pay for his error by being executed and says to the Prince: If aught in this miscarried by my fault, let my old life be sacrificed. Lawrence always believes that good can come out of all situations, and even after calamity has claimed two lives it had succeeded in bringing the families together. The Friar is a very important character to the play he acts as a catalyst and speeds up the events of the play in many ways. He comes in later in the play showing that in a sense Shakespeare saved th e best character till the end. The Friar is involved in most of the many events, such as the wedding and potion plan. He is obviously a crucial character in the play, and without him we dont know what steps the lovers would have taken.Shakespeare also decides to introduce the friar in the heart of the play as he is the last character being introduced to the audiences this would in a way agree to the saying that the best is saved till last Not only is he introduced last but is placed right in the core of the community where he has the trust of the families of Verona and at the same time he is supposed to fulfil help for people in need. The friar had the whole world at his finger tips he couldve done anything he wanted, and this fact leaves the reader left with a predicament in what will happen. The friar builds up and creates the dramatic irony used throughout the play to grip the readers and keep them in suspense, wandering when and if the truth will ever surface.There are plenty of examples; such as when Juliet takes the potion and everyone thinks shes dead, another is when the lovers marry in secret. This manipulation of words add to the emotions and depth of feeling in this play. The Friar is the only person who is capbale of making any decisions in the play as he is one of the few people who knows exactly whats going on. He knows Juliet isnt really dead when she takes the potion, and everyone else thinks she is, also he is the only one who knows the lovers are married. These factors all reflect his importance in the development in the play without him there would be no drama there wouldnt be the excitement and the tradagy without him the marriage couldnt of taken place, the friar being placed as the central figure in a play a couple of centurys ago may seem unusual at the time friars at that time played a spiritual role in their communities.It is very unusual for Shakespeare to have chosen the Friar to play such an essential role in a romantic play. Using a Friar to play such a damning role may have surfaced Shakespeares anti Catholic sentiments. The Friar is a sympathetic Catholic, a characterization that seemed to oppose the Latin humanists comic treatment of corrupt friars in the fifteenth century. Thus there is a gap between the Friars behaviour and the audiences expectation of his behaviour. This argument is most definitely valid because of the staunch Protestantism enforced during Elizabeths reign. So the audiences would be able to conceive the stereotyped friar and say that it was typical of Catholics at the time.The whole play is concentrated into only a few days which make it more dramatic and influential. There is a sense of inevitability -we sense that there will be no way out for Romeo and Juliet.- You have characers such as the nurse who provide considarable amusement she is talketive, scatterbrained, compassionate and funloving, this character along with a few of Romeos friends is added to give the play a touch of comed y and a glimmer of hope.Time is of essence in this play as Romeo is turned down by Rosaline, and at the same time Paris asks for Juliets hand; both of which occur in the morning. Romeo and Juliet die by night fall suggesting that their short life was complete, as the sun goes down.It was very common in the Elizabethan era to write plays in poetry form. Shakespeare is not tied down by one form of poetry, and throughout the play he employs a variety of linguistic geniuses which make his work stand out against the norm. Some of his poetry does rhyme, and this is done to make things sound more important and formal, For never was a story of more woe, Than this of Juliet and her Romeo. Shakespeare plays around with the words to change the pace; by using longer or shorter words depending on how quickly events are moving. Shakespeare uses prose when common characters such as the nurse are talking and also in some comedy parts. The language seems to be overloaded with linguistic tricks; incl uding puns antithesis, pardoxes and oxymorons. This may have been done to express the eternal love that Romeo and Juliet held for one another.Shakespeare prepares the reader for the inevitable death of Romeo and Juliet, as their deaths always feel very close. Juliet is linked to death many times throughout the play grave is like to be my wedding bed, there are also the same hints that Romeo is also going to die as Juliet sees him so low, as one dead in the bottom of a tomb. Romeo and Juliet are troubled throughout with thoughts of suicide, and a readiness to experience it, a lot of these thoughts are expressed in front of Friar Lawrence where Romeo asks for a poison or sharp-ground knife and threatens to kill himself after hearing he had been banished from Verona.The Friar calms him down and suggests an alternative solution to Romeo who was on the brink of suicide. Juliet also threatens to commit suicide if the Friars wisdom doesnt help and no resolution wise is found, all these pre ssures may have lead the Friar to make hasty decisions. Finally, each imagines that the other looks dead Methinks I see thee . . . as one dead in the bottom of a tomb, this theme continues until its predestined conclusion: the double suicide. Some may think that without the Friars quick responses both lovers would have committed suicide a lot earlier on.Impulsiveness is another key flaw that contributed to the early death of Romeo and Juliet. Impulsiveness in their sense of honour, impulsiveness in their sense of love, and in their sense of romanticism led Romeo and Juliet to their premature death. These virtues, that seek to safeguard life in the highest form, devastate the lovers because they take them to excessive levels. The Friar views this impulsiveness as dangerous and advised them to love moderately saying that even honey is loathsome in his own deliciousness. The Friar is conscious of Romeos hastiness when he questions him on how quickly he had abandoned Rosaline and fallen in love with Juliet, so he reminds Romeo of the suddenness of his decisions Hath washed thy sallow cheeks for Rosaline!In the introduction the chorus states to the audience that Romeo and Juliet were star-crossed, that is to say that fate controls them, it was said if two peoples stars were crossed they would never be together which is ironically what happened. Right from the start the audience know however hard they struggle these lovers will never achieve contentment. The characters too are aware of this predicament, as Romeo and Juliet constantly feel bad omens. At the start of the play when Romeo is making his way to the ball he has a bad feeling, he fears that Some consequence, yet hanging in the stars may lead to his death. When Romeo believes that Juliet is dead, he cries out, Then I defy you, stars, completing the idea that the love between Romeo and Juliet is in opposition to the decrees of destiny. The advice of the Friar when he hears of their love is very cynical These violent delights have violent ends. Subsequently many critics think that the Friar merely acted as a catalyst to speed up this separation and was not the direct cause. He was merely an instrument instructed by the stars to carry out this role and he did this to perfection. Had it not been for the Friar the instruments of fate would have chosen another means to keep them apart.Religion similarly demanded priorities that Romeo and Juliet could not abide by because of the intensity of their love. Though in most situations the lovers uphold the traditions of Christianity (they wait to marry before consummating their love), their love is so potent that they begin to think of each other in blasphemous terms. For example, Juliet calls Romeo The God of my idolatry, elevating Romeo to level of God .The Friar starts to sense their uncontrolled passion for each other when he says that he will not leave them alone Till holy church incorporate two in one, this could be another trigger that cause d the Friar to hasten and agree to the marriage. Juliet should have obeyed her father unquestioningly when informed about her wedding to Paris, but she does not because she is already married. These were big sins especially in a catholic country, so the reader is left in a dilemma.Romeo and Juliet were hopeful that their families would be united by their love. They thought that their love was so incredible it would overcome all boundaries, which is what makes this play such a memorable one. This play is out of the ordinary because many themes are incorporated into it, love, comedy, society at war and tragedy. If they hadnt treated love as the be-all and end-all they wouldnt have died. However other people believe that Romeo and Juliet were so in love they had to die, it was written in the stars and it was fate that bought them together but also kept them apart.Their tragic ending is a direct consequence of the other main theme in the play: a society at war with itself that makes the ir love at once so tragic and so beautiful. It is love against the odds. Love is used as a central theme in all four of Shakespeares tradgies Romeo and Juliet ,Troilus and Cressida Othello and Anthony and Cleopatra in a way these plays describe love in four different phases from the strong passion of the youngest lovers to the final search for love by Anthony and Cleopatra lovers who are again torn between two different worlds. What is the role and importance of Friar Lawrence which lead to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet Essay Example What is the role and importance of Friar Lawrence which lead to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet Essay Romeo and Juliet are emblems of true love that have been used over the years as icons for other lovers who found themselves torn in half like them, many of whom faced a similar ill-fated end. The ingredients of a tragedy are all sewn into this play, which is unusual for Shakespeare as most of his work in the early years was comedies and historical plays. The heroes in this story portray excess courage, arrogance and ambition.They took life changing decisions despite their tender age. The affects of the play on the audience is cleansing as they feel pity and terror. In my opinion the reason for the lovers downfall lies outside the actions of any characters and ultimately in the workings of fate which is referred to several times throughout the play. Romeo and Juliet is considered a tragedy by many as it fits in with the requirements set out by Aristotle. Shakespeare used a variet of sources for this drama. The story of Romeo and Julliet is taken from the poem a Tragical history of Ro meus and Juliet.We are going to study at first hand the role played by Friar Lawrence which contributed to the lovers death. We will begin by looking at what his ideal role in the communtiy would have been. We will also look at his character, and the motives behind the actions he took. However before we analyse the Friar we must study the social backround of the play.Italy at that time was regarded as a passionate and wealthy place; hence an ideal setting for this tragedy. Love is as you would expect the plays central and most significant theme. Shakespeare helps to depict love in many different forms; it is aggressive, euphoric, intense, and without doubt overcomes all other ethics and morals. Shakespeare uses religion to illustrate the lovers passion, This holy shrine. whereas at other times love is described as a sort of magic: Alike bewitched by the charm of looks. Juliet perhaps most perfectly describes her love for Romeo by refusing to describe it: I cannot sum up sum of half my wealth. Love, in other words resists any single metaphor as it is too powerful to be contained with words. Their love and infatuation with each other caused the young lovers to challenge their family name, Deny thy father and refuse thy name, and Juliet asks, Or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, and Ill no longer be a Capulet.The social institutions at that time regarded marriage as way of gaining status and economic stability. Early on Shakespeare introduced a society that prefigures capitalism, one that is heavily influenced by material exchange. The people of Verona relied on pride, honour and money, even when the item in question was love. When speaking of marriage the Capulets use language full of economic expressions. Capulets instructions to Paris are that; Inherit at my house. Hear all, all see, and like her most whose merit most shall be; which one more view, of many, mine being one. Lady Capulet also refers to the relationship between Paris and her daughter as a n egotiation when she explains to Juliet how she may, By having him she would be making herself no less.This economically driven society alienated spiritual concerns leading to a gloomy peace prevailing. Love in that era was a commodity such as goods and services. Parents fully expected to make money on their trade.Honour was also a central issue for the people of Verona, a person would have to side with their family even if they were in the wrong or face being seen as a traitor. Romeo and Juliet went against their family honour by marrying an enemy. But the social emphasis placed on masculine honour was so profound that Romeo could not merely ignore the dispute just because he loves Juliet. It dictated his irrational behaviour that took another life and separated the families further. Both were in a constant dilemma between the responsibilities and actions demanded by the social institutions, and those demanded by their private desires. Romeos sense of honour leads him to find the pr iest so he can marry them.In the sixteenth century the priest was seen as a person who was willing to dedicate his whole life to religion, a man of God and a bound between local communities. They played a fundamental role in their communities especially in times of conflict, where their judgement and judicious advice was principal. Laurence is presented as a holy man who was trusted and respected by all the other characters. Capulets comment about the Friar that all our whole city is much bound to him is an ironic acknowledgment as he played an important role in the many disastrous events which followed and abused his trusted role. Thus the Friar is centrally placed with close ties to everyone enabling him to carry out his plans without questioning. His knowledge of Greek mythology and his great understanding of plants show Friar Lawrences high level of education as he speaks of the Greek God Titan.The first speech for the Friar is very important; it is both rhythmic and calm. It en ables the audience to create their first impressions and establishes a standard for the Friar which he tries to maintain, but sadly fails. The regularity of the speech calms someone in to a feeling of acceptance as he is expressing the conventional attitudes of a priest, not his own, and one feels a sense of falseness. Shakespeare uses the Friars language to manipulate the audiences feelings towards him. The words are all used for effect and we question the real wisdom and knowledge of the Friar.Friar Lawrence has a vast knowledge of plants and flowers, and grows a magnificent garden, he is first introduced as an apothecary rather then a Friar, which is the historical name for a medical practitioner who formulates and dispenses medication. He remarks that every plant and herb has its own special properties, and that nothing exists in nature that cannot be put to both good and bad use.Thus, poison is not intrinsically evil but is instead a natural material made lethal by human hands. Here poison symbolizes human societys predisposition to poison good things and make them lethal, In man as well as herbs grace and rude will, just as the futile Capulet-Montague dispute turns Romeo and Juliets love to poison. Ironically the Friars own words and thoughts are depicted over the course of the play as the events unfold. Unlike many of the other tragedies, this play does not have an evil villain, but rather people whose good qualities are turned to poison by the world in which they live in.The Friar chooses to concern himself with the health of the body and mind, so he chooses to use only those herbs which are not harmful he says that naught so vile on the earth doth live, but to the earth some special good doth give. The apothecary on the other hand, does not worry about Romeos spiritual or physical health, and so he chooses to use his herbs for the sale of all substances, including poisons. Shakespeare contrasts the Friars hopefulness with the harsher material world of Verona, placing him and the apothecary on two opposite sides, thus where the Friar fails, the apothecary steps in with a quick remedy. While the Friar has botanical supplies to aid in his medical work, including a basket of willows, baleful weeds, and precious-juiced flowers, the apothecarys shop contains objects only for show or for superficial use. Even attitudes towards the shops are different.Romeo remarks on the apothecarys shop with obvious neglect, as it is full of dusty boxes and very few actual items are set up to try to attract customers. Shakespeares presentation of the Friars cell and garden characterizes a philosopher and healer, and the apothecarys shop an unsuccessful salesman. Thus the audience is forced to compare the two figures and note their remarkable differences. The play uses the priests fading holistic medicine to show how economic materialism has made the apothecary a less charitable medical practitioner. The Friars experience of plants enabled him to carry out his second role as poison commissioner, without him Juliet would not have been able to fake her own death.The Friar is a close friend and advisor to Romeo and has a huge influence on his decisions, this is apparent when Romeo addresses the Friar as father and the Friar addresses Romeo as his son. The Friar makes all the important decisions with regards to Romeo and Juliet, and what ever he advises them they follow to the book. Romeo on numerous occasions seeks help and consolation from the Friar. When Romeo comes to tell Friar Lawrence about his engagement, the Friar offers wise pieces of advice, young mens love lies in their eyes meaning Romeo should love Juliet for who she is and not how she looks.He also tells Romeo that women may fall when there is no strength in men, meaning that if he is not stable and constant Juliet may become inconstant herself, and thinks that Romeo may be blinded by love. this allows the reader to depict and build up an image of a friar who is unders tanding, rational and a man who understands the need of moderation especially in the case of Romeo and Juliet not the stereotyped friars we see now a days in society, his holy understanding of religion also is reinforced when the nurse was astounded by the friars speech and stayed the night to hear good counsel. This portrays to the reader the manner he spoke provided motivating guidance.Children at that time were subservient to the adults in the family; they were raised to respect and obey their parents. The fact that Romeo and Juliet were unable to inform their parents of their love illustrates the huge gap between them and their families. This in fact gives the Friar an extra duty of care, as he becomes solely responsible for their actions as he is there lone confident. In Juliets case the role of the mother is taken over by the wet nurse who Juliet often finds solace with, they are affectionate towards each other, and often the nurse refers to Juliet as lamb and pretty fool. Thu s he plays another important role as confident and adviser to both the young lovers. This also reflects the technique used by Shakespeare by the balancing of the characters.Friar Lawrences attributes seem to have become contaminated as we go through the play and he makes a number of fatal mistakes. Firstly he marries the two lovers without their parents consent, and on Romeos return from killing Tybalt, the Friar encourages Romeo to stand strong and to consummate the marriage Ascend her chamber, hence and comfort her, knowing full well that the differences between the two families are now irreconcilable. Many critics may have seen this event as a chance for the Friar to re-think his next steps and annul their marriage.Other flaws in the Friars character became apparent as his involvement in the schemes of Romeo and Juliet increased; and he began to warp cunning and calculating plans out of his head, such as the fanatical potion plan. Some readers may think that the Friar felt to bla me and wanted to try and rectify matters, and do the right thing since his reputation was paramount to him.His deceptiveness surfaces first surfaces of which was between Juliet and Paris, and the other was when Juliets body was discovered. Being fully aware of the truth the Friar had the impertinence to use religion she is advanced above the clouds, as high as heaven itself and laid guilt on the family you love your child so ill and the heavens do lower upon you for some ill to calm and control the situation and to continue on with his plan. The Friar also remains very composed throughout this scene which reinforces his superiority and confidence among the community.Building up the wild potion plan in his head, the Friar must have felt hesitant, apprehensive, and very worried. This is evident as he thinks the plan is as desperate an execution, as the one they were trying to prevent, and ironically Juliet would need to copst with death himself to scape from it. The Friar should have listened to his own wise words before giving the potion to Juliet. He should not have played the role of God. As a man of God should he not have subdued to the will of God and not tried to take fate into his own hands? People of God usually made logical thoroughly thought out decisions, this Friar is very distant from these expectations and many may have labelled him as being too politically ambitious and a fate meddler. The Friar himself acknowledges the power of God at the end of the play, A greater power than we can contradict hath thwarted our intents, so what possessed him to take such actions?Another deplorable aspect of the Friars behaviour is his response when he finds Juliet in the tomb, instead of remaining with her and preventing her death; he flees at the sound of people coming. This shows his fear of accepting responsibility and his selfishness. This use of nature for unnatural purposes is also ironic as he ultimately, acts distinctly human by fleeing the tomb and aban doning Juliet.In addition to this on numerous occasions the Friar seems to be aware that this marriage would only lead to chaos and catastrophe. When addressing Romeo about his previous love (Rosaline), he states that both women where not the right lovers for Romeo Not in a grave, To lay one in, another out it have, suggesting that his second choice of lover is just as bad as the first. Also when marrying Romeo and Juliet he asks smile the heavens in order that sorrow chide us not. This feeling of uneasiness is further reinforced when claiming that violent delights have violent ends using an extreme metaphor to describe Romeos passion like fire and powder hence a very explosive obsession.Many would argue that if the Friar had such a bad feeling about the whole thing, why he did he go ahead with it? Perhaps the Lawrence felt an internal conflict within him the conflict of self against self.- He knew in his mind that it was wrong to help Romeo and Juliet run away with her lover, who happened to be a murderer too. But he felt himself reach out to them, he had known them seen they were children and knew they were in a desperate situation. But the problem was that the only way to solve everything was to take a wrong path that everyone opposed to.The Friar does have some positive aspects to his personality. His initial decision to marry the lovers is well-meaning as he believes it may turn the hatred between the families to pure love he agrees to marry Romeo and Juliet in the hope that their marriage will heal the rift between the Montagues and the Capulets. However he was naive in his assessment of the feud and hadnt reflected fully on the implications of Romeo and Juliets clandestine marriage.Some might argue that the Friar married them hastily because he wanted to direct their relationship towards a positive end, and prevent them having pre-marital sex. Marriage is sacred to the church and once Romeo and Juliet were married and their marriage was consummated, it became part of the Friars duty to protect this marriage; in addition it would be sinful for Juliet to re-marry whilst still being married to Romeo. In a society filled with materialism the Friar may be seen as a humble servant to divine love. At the end of the play Friar Laurence owns up and accepts the death sentence because of his role in the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Of course he wasnt to know that the marriage would have had such a tragic ending.However, he feels guilty and is prepared to pay for his error by being executed and says to the Prince: If aught in this miscarried by my fault, let my old life be sacrificed. Lawrence always believes that good can come out of all situations, and even after calamity has claimed two lives it had succeeded in bringing the families together. The Friar is a very important character to the play he acts as a catalyst and speeds up the events of the play in many ways. He comes in later in the play showing that in a sense Shakespeare saved th e best character till the end. The Friar is involved in most of the many events, such as the wedding and potion plan. He is obviously a crucial character in the play, and without him we dont know what steps the lovers would have taken.Shakespeare also decides to introduce the friar in the heart of the play as he is the last character being introduced to the audiences this would in a way agree to the saying that the best is saved till last Not only is he introduced last but is placed right in the core of the community where he has the trust of the families of Verona and at the same time he is supposed to fulfil help for people in need. The friar had the whole world at his finger tips he couldve done anything he wanted, and this fact leaves the reader left with a predicament in what will happen. The friar builds up and creates the dramatic irony used throughout the play to grip the readers and keep them in suspense, wandering when and if the truth will ever surface.There are plenty of examples; such as when Juliet takes the potion and everyone thinks shes dead, another is when the lovers marry in secret. This manipulation of words add to the emotions and depth of feeling in this play. The Friar is the only person who is capbale of making any decisions in the play as he is one of the few people who knows exactly whats going on. He knows Juliet isnt really dead when she takes the potion, and everyone else thinks she is, also he is the only one who knows the lovers are married. These factors all reflect his importance in the development in the play without him there would be no drama there wouldnt be the excitement and the tradagy without him the marriage couldnt of taken place, the friar being placed as the central figure in a play a couple of centurys ago may seem unusual at the time friars at that time played a spiritual role in their communities.It is very unusual for Shakespeare to have chosen the Friar to play such an essential role in a romantic play. Using a Friar to play such a damning role may have surfaced Shakespeares anti Catholic sentiments. The Friar is a sympathetic Catholic, a characterization that seemed to oppose the Latin humanists comic treatment of corrupt friars in the fifteenth century. Thus there is a gap between the Friars behaviour and the audiences expectation of his behaviour. This argument is most definitely valid because of the staunch Protestantism enforced during Elizabeths reign. So the audiences would be able to conceive the stereotyped friar and say that it was typical of Catholics at the time.The whole play is concentrated into only a few days which make it more dramatic and influential. There is a sense of inevitability -we sense that there will be no way out for Romeo and Juliet.- You have characers such as the nurse who provide considarable amusement she is talketive, scatterbrained, compassionate and funloving, this character along with a few of Romeos friends is added to give the play a touch of comed y and a glimmer of hope.Time is of essence in this play as Romeo is turned down by Rosaline, and at the same time Paris asks for Juliets hand; both of which occur in the morning. Romeo and Juliet die by night fall suggesting that their short life was complete, as the sun goes down.It was very common in the Elizabethan era to write plays in poetry form. Shakespeare is not tied down by one form of poetry, and throughout the play he employs a variety of linguistic geniuses which make his work stand out against the norm. Some of his poetry does rhyme, and this is done to make things sound more important and formal, For never was a story of more woe, Than this of Juliet and her Romeo. Shakespeare plays around with the words to change the pace; by using longer or shorter words depending on how quickly events are moving. Shakespeare uses prose when common characters such as the nurse are talking and also in some comedy parts. The language seems to be overloaded with linguistic tricks; incl uding puns antithesis, pardoxes and oxymorons. This may have been done to express the eternal love that Romeo and Juliet held for one another.Shakespeare prepares the reader for the inevitable death of Romeo and Juliet, as their deaths always feel very close. Juliet is linked to death many times throughout the play grave is like to be my wedding bed, there are also the same hints that Romeo is also going to die as Juliet sees him so low, as one dead in the bottom of a tomb. Romeo and Juliet are troubled throughout with thoughts of suicide, and a readiness to experience it, a lot of these thoughts are expressed in front of Friar Lawrence where Romeo asks for a poison or sharp-ground knife and threatens to kill himself after hearing he had been banished from Verona.The Friar calms him down and suggests an alternative solution to Romeo who was on the brink of suicide. Juliet also threatens to commit suicide if the Friars wisdom doesnt help and no resolution wise is found, all these pre ssures may have lead the Friar to make hasty decisions. Finally, each imagines that the other looks dead Methinks I see thee . . . as one dead in the bottom of a tomb, this theme continues until its predestined conclusion: the double suicide. Some may think that without the Friars quick responses both lovers would have committed suicide a lot earlier on.Impulsiveness is another key flaw that contributed to the early death of Romeo and Juliet. Impulsiveness in their sense of honour, impulsiveness in their sense of love, and in their sense of romanticism led Romeo and Juliet to their premature death. These virtues, that seek to safeguard life in the highest form, devastate the lovers because they take them to excessive levels. The Friar views this impulsiveness as dangerous and advised them to love moderately saying that even honey is loathsome in his own deliciousness. The Friar is conscious of Romeos hastiness when he questions him on how quickly he had abandoned Rosaline and fallen in love with Juliet, so he reminds Romeo of the suddenness of his decisions Hath washed thy sallow cheeks for Rosaline!In the introduction the chorus states to the audience that Romeo and Juliet were star-crossed, that is to say that fate controls them, it was said if two peoples stars were crossed they would never be together which is ironically what happened. Right from the start the audience know however hard they struggle these lovers will never achieve contentment. The characters too are aware of this predicament, as Romeo and Juliet constantly feel bad omens. At the start of the play when Romeo is making his way to the ball he has a bad feeling, he fears that Some consequence, yet hanging in the stars may lead to his death. When Romeo believes that Juliet is dead, he cries out, Then I defy you, stars, completing the idea that the love between Romeo and Juliet is in opposition to the decrees of destiny. The advice of the Friar when he hears of their love is very cynical These violent delights have violent ends. Subsequently many critics think that the Friar merely acted as a catalyst to speed up this separation and was not the direct cause. He was merely an instrument instructed by the stars to carry out this role and he did this to perfection. Had it not been for the Friar the instruments of fate would have chosen another means to keep them apart.Religion similarly demanded priorities that Romeo and Juliet could not abide by because of the intensity of their love. Though in most situations the lovers uphold the traditions of Christianity (they wait to marry before consummating their love), their love is so potent that they begin to think of each other in blasphemous terms. For example, Juliet calls Romeo The God of my idolatry, elevating Romeo to level of God .The Friar starts to sense their uncontrolled passion for each other when he says that he will not leave them alone Till holy church incorporate two in one, this could be another trigger that cause d the Friar to hasten and agree to the marriage. Juliet should have obeyed her father unquestioningly when informed about her wedding to Paris, but she does not because she is already married. These were big sins especially in a catholic country, so the reader is left in a dilemma.Romeo and Juliet were hopeful that their families would be united by their love. They thought that their love was so incredible it would overcome all boundaries, which is what makes this play such a memorable one. This play is out of the ordinary because many themes are incorporated into it, love, comedy, society at war and tragedy. If they hadnt treated love as the be-all and end-all they wouldnt have died. However other people believe that Romeo and Juliet were so in love they had to die, it was written in the stars and it was fate that bought them together but also kept them apart.Their tragic ending is a direct consequence of the other main theme in the play: a society at war with itself that makes the ir love at once so tragic and so beautiful. It is love against the odds. Love is used as a central theme in all four of Shakespeares tradgies Romeo and Juliet ,Troilus and Cressida Othello and Anthony and Cleopatra in a way these plays describe love in four different phases from the strong passion of the youngest lovers to the final search for love by Anthony and Cleopatra lovers who are again torn between two different worlds.

Sample Essay Against Indian Removal Act

Sample Essay Against Indian Removal ActMany people who are coming to America as illegal immigrants are confused about sample essays that are to be used against the Indian Removal Act. They will know it as the Mexican Border Act. This is a law designed to try and keep immigrants from coming into the country illegally.There are many types of immigration laws that exist for any number of reasons, but this one is specifically designed to keep people from crossing the border and staying in the country illegally. It was originally created to deal with criminal aliens, and then people who were overstaying their visas, but it has since been made even more strict.Many people who are looking to immigrate to the United States will not know anything about immigration laws in America, but the sample essay that you will use to help you in your essay will definitely help you out. You should read this article over again so that you understand everything that you need to know.The first part of the sa mple essay that you will read over is a description of the purpose of the Indian Removal Act. The U.S. government was frustrated at the amount of immigrants that were crossing the border illegally and stayed up for months working on changing the law. The other reason why this is important to understand is because it is an offense to knowingly enter the country illegally.There are many different types of offenses that can be charged if someone is found to be entering the country illegally, but the most common ones are for crimes against property and immigration crimes. If you are charged with these types of offenses, you will need to talk to a lawyer that specializes in immigration laws in order to determine if you are guilty or not.The second part of the essay that you will be using is a description of what to expect as an immigrant. There are many things that youwill have to do in order to get by and make it to the United States legally. A lot of this will depend on your circumstan ce, but there are several that you will have to do on your own.Many times you will not be able to prepare for every situation in your life, but there are some types of things that you will always have to do, and they are like short stories that you will read over again until you learn them. These are things like learning English, going through the proper channels to get your green card, and completing all of the tasks that the law requires of you.If you are trying to find a way to help you defend yourself in court when you are in a dispute against the Indian Removal Act, then the sample essay that you will read over will be very helpful. It is important that you take this opportunity to study what this type of law entails, and it is also important that you get legal advice as well.

Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale Erp Implementation free essay sample

I will also address how the project team managed and communicated it’s vision amongst the firm and how the new roles were defined, communicated amp; understood. The analysis will focus up to and including the implementation of the system. As the company grew over the years, Bombardier’s strategy of growth by acquisition turned the firm into a â€Å"textbook silo organization†. This created problems as systems did not communicate with each other effectively. This inefficiency generated additional costs because the firm had to maintain all the different systems. Another problem, related to the operation of the aerospace division, was the low visibility of inventory and lack of integration between the old computer systems. This caused process delays, low inventory turns amp; price inconsistency from suppliers. The Bombardier Manufacturing System (BMS) , the group of information technology applications that had been supporting Bombardier Aerospace’s manufacturing activities, had not evolved to cope with the fast changes. We will write a custom essay sample on Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale Erp Implementation or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The BMS capabilities had become limited. We can assume that Bombardier was not a fully integrated company at that time because there was a clear lack of coordination and unity. An example would be how employees would create numerous stand-alone databases throughout the company on operations specific to their function without realizing the negative effect it causes to the rest of the organization such as data errors or omissions. But Bombardier Aerospace was working on becoming an integrated Company, as the Vice-President of Operations and Project Sponsor was aware of the challenges and created a Vision: â€Å"One Company†: To align the operations of its acquired companies by implementing common roles and responsibilities. To meet this enormous challenge, a Enterprise Resource planning (ERP) system was first implemented at Bombardier Aerospace. The first attempt in 2000 was a costly failure. The implementation of this technology without the corresponding organizational changes was the main reason of its failure. The factors that contributed to its breakdown are identified as : Focusing the implementation on inappropriate business processes, an outdated company vision, a weak sponsorship model, insufficient involvement of internal employees and having too many third-party consultants employed on the project. In October 2001, Bombardier Manufacturing Information System (BMIS) was created by the Senior Project Manager to establish a new integrated manufacturing system. BMIS was the first project launched with a vision of an integrated organization. Once completed it would support 9,500 users over seven sites and the main benefit of the system’s integration is the cost savings of over $1. 171 billion and a one time reduction in material inventory of $219 million. To Create amp; implement such a system, a blue print of the operation was created. An integration team was formed; There role was to identify integration points where a process crossed functional boundaries, and independently resolve integration points that could potentially cause disagreement. The functional council took high –level decisions regarding the design of the projects. The BMIS team requested that the plants provide them with experienced employees for the design phase. Some problems that the BMIS project manager was concerned about is that there was a lack of strong business employees, although empowered to make decisions and complete the design had to constantly go back to the business in order to validate. Another problem was the documentation that was requested by the BMIS team were not provided. As a result, the Design phase ran over schedule by several months. Bombardier Aerospace decided to go with a progressive implementation of the system. BMIS would be implemented one plant at a time starting with there newest facility, the Mirabel Plant. The Critical success factor for the project was the â€Å" Vanilla† approach to system design: It was important that the first roll-out or implementation of the system at the Mirabel plant to be a controlled one. Bombardier limited the scope of the first roll-out one section at a time and trained the rest of the shop accordingly. This approach would siege the system to one part of the plant and identify lessons for subsequent roll-outs. The Restructuring of the procurement function plays an important role in realizing the vision of the BMIS. As was stated earlier, one of the problems the firm faced was the low visibility of inventory. By improving the visibility, you can reduce inventory levels that would improve liquidity and reduce cycle time. It was decided mid-project to restructure the procurement function, it was undertaken in parallel with the implementation of the BMIS and was called the Material Resource Planning Technology. The main idea for procurement was to minimize the total acquisition cost and overall procurement costs by concentrating on a centralized and strategic sourcing of inventory. This big change would require the training of new employees and have them ready to use the new system. Data Management was also a parallel project, it can be divided in 2 activities: 1. Data Cleansing: identified as a major risk of the project. 2. Data Preparation: Extraction, mapping, staging and consolidation of data. Before going live it was important to prepare the users in utilizing the new system. Due to the pressure of staying on schedule, training were delivered to users in a short period of time which wasn’t effective because transmitting such a large amount of information in a sort period resulted in a negative effect. Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale ERP Implementation free essay sample Bombardier’s Background Bombardier started in the year 1942 and went on to become a key player in the transportation industry. It entered the market of rail transportation in 1974 and 8 years later its desire to diversify led it to enter the Aerospace Industry. By January 31, 2007 Bombardier Transportation posted revenues of $ 6.6 Billion of which 55% came from Aerospace division. The Aerospace division has headquarters in Montreal and is the 3rd largest designer and manufacturer of commercial aircraft in the world. Bombardier Aerospace believed that regional jet is necessary to compete with the range of 1000 seat planes that its nearest rival Embraer in introducing the market. The detrimental impact of 9/11, war in Iraq have led to reduction of passenger numbers for large carriers which gave Bombardier a firm position in the airline industry. Business Problem As the company grew over the years, Bombardier’s strategy of growth by acquisition turned the firm into a â€Å"textbook silo organization†. We will write a custom essay sample on Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale ERP Implementation or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This created problems as systems did not communicate with each other effectively. This inefficiency generated additional costs because the firm had to maintain all the different systems. Another problem, related to the operation of the aerospace division, was the low visibility of inventory and lack of integration between the old computer systems. This caused process delays, low inventory turns price inconsistency from suppliers. The Bombardier Manufacturing System (BMS), the group of information technology applications that had been supporting Bombardier Aerospace’s manufacturing activities, had not evolved to cope with the fast changes. The BMS capabilities had become limited. We can assume that Bombardier was not a fully integrated company at that time because there was a clear lack of coordination and unity. An example would be how employees would create numerous stand-alone databases throughout the company on operations specific to their function. Solution for the business problem Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system was considered by Aerospace as best way to realize the strategic vision.It was realized early on by senior management that if the many assorted clerical process could be organized under one overarching system, the resulting efficiency would enable a savings of 1.71 billion dollars. First ERP Implementation Wasted approximately 130 million dollars due to an improper alignment of IT and business strategy. Accordingly, this time around there existed great imperative to ensure that the new project team created a blue print that â€Å"cut a line through the processes horizontally†. The design of the PC term project is based on similar principles diverging perhaps only on how Bombardier insourced rather than outsourced its development. Nonetheless, like how the consulting group PC contracted has also overpriced its services to the tune of $6,000 dollars yearly (See Cost-Benefit Analysis), the innumerable consultants Bombardier originally hired delivered a product whose quality was out of proportion to its price. Another parallel lies in how for both Projects, meetings with the senior management needed to be conduct so as to ensure that the proposed and design project appropriately captured the company’s business strategy. The case presents the implementation of an ERP system in Bombardier, along with all the major changes the corporation undertook for a successful transition. The problem that Bombardier is facing is the ability to find out how to implement an ERP system that will contribute to the large inherited data and processes from other sectors of the company. At this point Bombardier is facing compatibility issues with their systems. An answer was needed to enable and establish a better way of communication between systems or establish an alternative to become a better centralized system and find a solution to the lack of integration of their legacy systems. Problem/Issue Statement The problem presented by Joseph-Armand Bombardier is the upcoming third round of ERP implementation in his organization. Even though a big improvement over the efficiency and success of execution between the first ERP round (Mirabel plant) and second round (Saint-Laurent plant), there is still room for improvement. The focus is to identify the practices vs. the best of the best practices in the industry in relation to ERP implementation and offer specifics on how to make this third round provide a higher success rate. Main Problem: The rollout of ERP at the Mirabel plant and then followed by the Saint-Laurent plant did improve, but still had their fair share of challenges. Our area of improvement will be from the results given after ERP went live at Saint-Laurent. The main problem appears to be still be a disconnect between the business vs. project team and properly communicating and training those who will be using the new ERP system (SAP in this situation). While the overall response was positive, not every issue from the Mirabel plant has been corrected and resolved. Symptoms: A few symptoms mentioned was that specialized knowledge was concentrated in a few individuals, embellishing the scorecards to mask some of the issues, gaps in understanding of priority between project team and actual business, and finally some feedback on wanting SAP to have done more for an individual’s current job. The scope of the problem involves the next plant/location of Bombardier that will have ERP implemented to replace their legacy system. It is vital to establish â€Å"best of best† practices to provide a seamless transition with positive short and long-term results. We do not want to take a step backwards with loss of productivity, dissatisfied employees, and weak communication within the organization. Situation Assessment The context of the problem is based primarily on improvements over the last ERP implementation from the Saint-Laurent plant as well as looking at the best of best industry practices for successfully rolling out ERP in a large size corporation. We, as the consultants, must look at what’s been done both  internally and externally, and develop strategies to help guide Bombardier into a smoother process. Again, with looking at the symptoms that Bombardier is currently experiencing post-Saint Laurent plant, the company has a clearer vision on how to proceed. The decision criteria to consider include: Greater active involvement with management, stronger communication, closer link between business and support group, and increase in productivity and output. List of Plausible Alternative Courses of Action and Evaluations The alternative courses of actions would be to adopt key best-of-best practices that have led to a positive ERP implementation. Based on a study down by Panorama Consulting (Link# 1), we see that five key findings found in ERP implementations done in 2010 include the following: ERP implementations take longer than expected Software as a service (SaaS) implementations take less time than on-premise ERP implementations, but deliver less business value Companies do not effectively manage the organizational changes of ERP Based on these five problems, I would recommend that Bombardier adopt/continue to strengthen the following best practices (Cite #1): 1. Executive management should endorse the ERP project and remain active throughout implementation. – As was seen with the Saint Laurent plant, management was very active in meetings, progress reports, and being a pro-voice for ERP. Even the Vice-President could be seen at the location promoting the new software. Moving forward, this model should be continued and strengthened. By having upper management communicate (see item# 5) the feedback and updates to all personnel, it will show that every employee has a role to play and is vital to the success of this rollout. 2. Project manager should be assigned full-time to the implementation. – By not having to separate one’s time from work and ERP preparation, you can ensure that focus and attention is being given as a high priority. This will trickle down to show employees that this is not a haphazard process, but one that takes time and is meant to have a lasting effect on the organization. 3. Employees should receive  training on how to work as a team on a project before implementation begins. – With SAP, departments are connecting in a way that may be unfamiliar to those who were used to having their own system and methodology for working. For that reason, I would recommend having these team building exercises to make everyone aware and comfortable with sharing information. Aside from that, it is important for everyone to know how their work in the new system can directly (and indirectly) affect others in different departments. For instance, knowing what happens when a wrong route code is entered and the effect it has on logistics can help to prevent these errors and eliminate this â€Å"me† mentality. 4. Employees should receive training before and after implementation. One key area that was improved from the Mirabel implementation was that not a lot of training should be given before vs. after ERP is live. Instead, it is wise to have the employees aware of the changes coming, but to also provide more in depth training sessions and refresher courses after those employees have had time to use the system. As stated in the case, a lot of unknown problems/issues originated after the system went live and the company would do well to retain a support staff on location (or easily accessible via phone/computer) if questions do arise. 5. Communication must be maintained throughout process and in an efficient manner. – By holding department meetings, producing a newsletter, or just having impromptu updates, employees will be kept in the loop and will see the importance of ERP implementation. While management would not want to communicate any issues during these phases, it would be wise to be honest with employees and to offer a forum for feedback and suggestions. This is important as the employees will be the ones using the system more than anyone else involved in setting up ERP and when employees concerns go unheard, it can lead to disengagement and resentment. I am not too concerned about budget costs, mainly because Bombardier is already familiar with the process and as they continue to bring SAP over to their other facilities, there is a positive network effect of sharing information from the other locations and even bringing those â€Å"power users† over to assist. Whereas other companies looked at in other case studies may have had experienced far greater risks with ERP implementation, this is because the organization was not ready for change. Case Study Conclusions While viewing the quality and logical recommendation, it is right to say that Bombardier should allow the ERP process to take place once more and finish what was once started. With the BMIS team created, training and support would be available to be present during future implementations which would create a positive influence on all the employees who are new to it all. Having training before and after the implementation would allow those who were never working on the same systems integrate and have familiarity working together. During the implementations, the upper management should always be present along with the BMIS team. The presence with upper management influences not only the employees but the consultants also. Also, the divisions would also need support while the entire company is being implemented because they are also in the loop . With ERP, Bombardier would allow their vision to become â€Å"One Company† and allow all their divisions to share and become centralized as a whole.